Investing in Gold, Apple Stock or Real Estate? Plus October report
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Investing in Gold, Apple Stock or Real Estate? Plus October report
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Oil, Europe, China, the High-Tech Boom & San Francisco Bay Area Real Estate
From a talk given by CEO Robert Dadurka to Paragon agents on October 7, 2015
& San Francisco Bay Area Real Estate
to Paragon agents on October 7, 2015
For the past several years, oil has typically been selling for about $100 to $110 per barrel. In the past six months, it’s gone down to about $45 per barrel. That constitutes a crash in the oil market. Generally speaking, it’s a great thing for consumers at the gas pumps and a great thing in terms of the delivery and manufacture of goods. For us as American consumers it’s like a huge tax break, but for the countries that are dependent upon oil revenues it’s not a positive development. When the markets are looking at all this, they’re looking where the growth is in economies worldwide: Countries that are big oil producers aren’t doing so well.
Why does this matter? Well, it matters to Russia since a large proportion of Russia’s economic activity is through petrochemicals. It also matters to the Middle East, Canada, Mexico, Nigeria and Brazil. All of these economies will continue to have difficulties going forward – especially the Middle East. In the Middle East, 90% of Iran’s budget comes from oil revenues. With oil at $45 per barrel, they’re running a huge budget deficit and their economy is in dire straits. And low oil prices seem to be here to stay for quite some time, with some economists saying the price could drop as low as $25 or $35 per barrel because of oversupply. Other natural commodities, such as iron ore (Australia) and copper (Chile) have also been hit by huge drops in prices. The significant number of national economies with large vested interests in oil and other commodities in decline will almost certainly see increasing financial challenges in the near future. That has a global impact, which has implications for us as well.
Let’s talk about Europe. Europe did things very differently from what the United States did in 2008 and 2009. Back in 2008, we had the huge stimulus package, which was very controversial at the time. It did create very significant deficits, but it was the right thing to do considering the extremely dangerous financial circumstances. The United States spent about $2 to $3 trillion dollars on stimulus projects, and then there was also the Federal Reserve Bank with its strategy of quantitative easing (QE1, QE2, QE3): The Fed basically bought assets worth another $4.5 trillion. Those two efforts got the US economy jumpstarted and it is now actually doing quite well.
Instead of stimulus and QE, Europe instead took a path of austerity because of its concern regarding budget deficits. It was worried about things that it shouldn’t have worried about considering the circumstances prevailing at the time, so it didn’t go and flood its markets with capital. Consequently, its economies never really recovered as well or as quickly as ours. Certain markets are doing better than others: Germany and England are doing better, but Europe as a whole isn’t doing so well. Europe’s annual GDP growth was running about 1% to 1.5% and it looked like it might be going in the right direction, but over the past several quarters it started to go in the opposite direction, 1% or less. But more importantly, deflation is beginning to take hold in Europe, which can be extremely dangerous for the economy. Our inflation rate is running about 1.5% to 2%, but Europe’s was negative for the past quarter and it’s expected to be negative this quarter as well. However, Europe is finally waking up and taking aggressive measures of the kind the United States did in 2008 and 2009. They’re flooding the markets with capital, and they have their own type of QE program. We’ll probably see a lot of that type of activity now in Europe.
Another issue for Europe is the huge migration of immigrants from Syria, elsewhere in the Middle East, Afghanistan and Africa. Most are heading to Europe, looking for new homes. Where are they going to live? Who is going to feed them? What about jobs? Those matters are going to weigh on the governments where these immigrants land, and will raise some very significant political and economic issues for the EU.
Moving on from oil and Europe, let’s talk about the biggest issue here in the Bay Area, which is China, the 2nd largest economy in the world. China is the issue that economists and investors are looking at most carefully. After many years of torrid growth, China started going into a financial bubble, even as many aspects of its economy – construction and manufacturing in particular – began to slow. This past summer, China’s stock market dropped about 40% virtually overnight, after a massive surge in the previous year (a surge that had little basis in economic fundamentals). This sudden, dramatic drop hit consumer psychology hard, and many investors were wiped out. The Chinese stock market is 98% owned by individual, “mom and pop” Chinese investors. China doesn’t have the large financial institutions that the United States does, such as the hedge funds and large mutual funds that dominate the market here. Instead, its stock market is owned by ordinary people, who are even more inexperienced financially than ordinary people here. They began to panic and sell their stocks, and this created a huge, plunging, downward spiral.
In response to this, China did two things: 1) it ceased the trading of all small- and mid-cap stocks (about 60% of their market), and 2) it began buying assets in great quantities. While the Chinese economy has stabilized as a result, it’s created somewhat of a false stabilization instead of letting the market go down and hit bottom and then be rebuilt. So there’s more to play out with the Chinese market — it doesn’t have the systems or institutions that we have in the United States, and the stock market collapse has changed the way people perceive China. We’re seeing a significant flight of capital from Asian consumers — the United States being a beneficiary of that. San Francisco and other US markets that the Chinese know are probably going to see more of that capital coming in the short term.
The other part of the bubble we’re seeing in China is in its residential and commercial real estate markets, as this video from the Financial Times illustrates. (You’ll want to click on “Skip Ad” quickly.)
Concerns Grow over China’s Property Market
What does all this mean to the United States? Of the S&P 500, only 10% of those companies get a significant portion of their revenue from China. So the actual impact here may not be that great in terms of fiscal impact or jobs, but there’s a psychological impact that could occur and we’ll see where that goes.
Now to the good news!
In the United States, we’re doing really, really well and headed in the right direction. Our inflation is very low — we’re running around 1.5% to 2%. Our GDP is on the upswing — this year we’re looking at about 2.5% GDP growth for the year following a slow (negative) first quarter of 2015 and a very healthy fourth quarter (projected around 3%). Some economists are saying we could see as high as 3.5% GDP growth next year. Unemployment: we’re at 5.1% – in most markets over the past couple decades that would be considered full employment. As mentioned earlier, low oil prices are a bonus to us and will add some grease to our engine. Additionally, interest rates remain very low. The United States is experiencing very strong household formation — we have 1.5 million new households and only 1.2 million new homes being built, so supply is not meeting demand. Real estate will be a shining part of our economy going forward. 65 million households in the US are making $100,000 per year or more — what’s even more interesting is that two thirds of those individuals are Generation X, Generation Y and Millennial. So there is now a transfer of wealth from Baby Boomers to these younger populations. Lastly, nine of the top 10 companies in the world are US based. We have Apple, we have Google — virtually all of the biggest, most successful and dynamic companies are here.
The San Francisco Bay Area is at the center of much of the United States’ growth. Two thirds of the jobs now in San Francisco are tech related. That’s a huge change from 10 or 20 years ago. We used to have textiles, Levi and Gap. We used to have Chevron, Bank of America and PacTel headquartered here. Now, tech is the big driver of our economy in San Francisco. It’s projected that the Bay Area’s population will grow by 30% by the year 2040. That’s about another million people — and where they’re going to live is a really good question. We’re seeing a lot of high-rise development in San Francisco and a lot of infill development in some other markets. The venture capital put into the United States’ economy in 2015 is estimated at $45 Billion. Of that $45 Billion, $26 Billion is in California, and 46% of that is specifically here in San Francisco. Why is all of this happening here? It’s the culture of innovation:
Silicon Valley’s Innovation Secret
When we’re talking about technology, there’s a misnomer that we’re just talking about Silicon Valley. But Silicon Valley is really the entire Bay Area now. High-tech is spreading throughout the city and around the bay. For example, Uber just bought the Sears building in downtown Oakland; PeopleSoft and Oracle are in Contra Costa. If GDP growth was measured just in the Bay Area counties, it would probably be 5.5% to 6% per year, a cracking fast pace. Though there will continue to be challenges, all this is certainly going to benefit our economy and our real estate market.
According to John Rahaim, Planning Director for the City and County of San Francisco, there are currently 8,130 units under construction, with an additional 1,850 units (195 projects) that have been permitted, and another 28,900 (110 projects) which are Entitled. On top of that, John reported, there are 15,670 units (580 projects) that are currently under review.
Recently Built & Under Construction
Mouse over map to reveal project icons and details
New Condo Developments in San Francisco...There are hundreds of existing condo buildings in San Francisco that have moved beyond the new development phase, and in which resale condos are commonly available. Please contact me with any questions. I stay informed on both the new and resale condo market.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
The San Francisco market data for March 2015 is here.
What are the 7 best neighborhoods in San Francisco in 2015?
Is my guess as good as Zillow’s?
– Who should we trust to help us make good real estate decisions?
As a Realtor in San Francisco for almost 25 years, I’ve observed with interest how the digital revolution impacts the real estate industry (e.g. Zillow/Trulia), as it has the hotel industry (e.g. AirBnB), retail (e.g. Alibaba) and the transportation industry (e.g. Uber and Lyft). Just as Uber owns no vehicles, Alibaba has no inventory, AirBnB owns no real estate, Zillow/Trulia have never sold a house.
Given Zillow and Trulia’s basis in the virtual world, can consumers trust the accuracy of the information presented to them on these sites? Most of the time, the answer is “no”.
Here is a typical example from Zillow’s popular Zestimate, referred to by so many buyers and sellers when valuing properties.
536 Moraga Street, San Francisco, CA
Zestimate: $1,269,361
Actual sales price: $2,500,000
Zestimate off by $1,230,639 or 51%
Property completely renovated since previous sale, not reflected in Zestimate.
The estimate was off by 51%! Relying solely on the data and the algorithms contained in these sites can actually be detrimental to a consumer making real estate decisions. There is misinformation and just too many inaccuracies. The information cannot stand on in its own. It must be interpreted and analyzed by a professional in order to help you make smart real estate choices.
My advice for consumers is to use the resources provided by the Internet, but to understand their limitations. The gap they leave is filled by the resource that Realtors provide.
Realtors help separate fact from fiction in the real estate world, providing the accuracy their clients need. Keep in mind that the value-add of the Realtor is not so much MLS access but turning that real estate information into knowledge. Knowledge is the market know-how acquired through training and through experience to interpret the information.
To understand the real estate industry, let’s go back a bit to see how the past has shaped the present.
To do this, we need three letters: MLS (Multiple Listing Service). The MLS is the system of gathering and sharing listing information by Brokers. A Listing Broker makes listings known to all other brokers using the MLS and shares the sales commission with the Buyer’s agent. The MLS has been around for more than a century, providing a collaborative incentive for brokers to share listing information to the benefit of broker, clients, customers, and the public at large.
Before technology, Realtors advertised their listings by holding signs on the side of the road. Later, the MLS came out in print every two weeks. It was the1990s before listings were put into the computerized database for the first time here in San Francisco.
Today the MLS is shared by Realtors with the public using a system called IDX (Internet Data Exchange). This is a real estate search site that allows the public access to part of the MLS that is deemed “publicly accessible.” Also, there are other sections of the MLS that have information that only Realtors can access.
With access to the MLS, buyers and sellers are now empowered, knowing what is on the market, and what has sold. The relationship between Realtor and client is more collaborative and transparent. They now work as a team in an ever-more competitive market to achieve the real estate goals before them.
Enter Zillow/Trulia (recently merged into the Zillow Group, referred to as Zillow). Known as “real estate aggregators,” they are online real estate database companies. They present real estate information to the public on their sites, and have reported almost 137 million unique users. Their income last year was reported as almost $344 million. I would call Realtors and Zillow “frenemies”. Ironically Zillow’s main source of income is from Realtors, who buy leads and ads from the site.
It’s an interesting business model. Zillow has never listed or sold a home and they say they never plan to. They depend on Realtors providing free content and then selling leads to this content back to Realtors looking for new business.
Zillow Group is doing well, as are the Realtors who benefit from the leads. But what about the consumer? Zillow does not have full MLS access to populate its data. Without full MLS access the Zillow information relies heavily on having individual Realtors manually input their listings on to the site, and on public records to provide sales information. As a result the listings are not always up-to-date, comprehensive, or accurate.
What about the Zestimate?
It is based on this incomplete data that Zillow provides something called “Zestimate” on its website, an automated tool that estimates a property’s value. Put in an address and the algorithm calculates the value of the home, sight unseen.
This is where it gets tricky for buyers and sellers. People often want to know what their home is worth without having to contact a Realtor to do a market analysis. However, every property is unique, and every buyer and seller situation is also unique. Convenient as it is, there is no way the Zestimate algorithm can quantify these unique variables, which makes the Zestimate, for the most part, inaccurate.
To illustrate, here are a couple more Zestimates comparing the estimate to the actual sales price:
3566 17th Street, San Francisco, CA
Z estimate: $1,191,058.
Actual sales price: $1,400,000
Zestimate off by $208,942 or 15%.
Property still shows as available but is already sold.
75 Caire Terrace, San Francisco, CA
Zestimate: $893,124
Actual sales price: $699,000
Zestimate off by $194,124 or 28%
Property still shows as available but is already sold.
Inaccurate data creates buyer and seller perceptions of real estate values that are not in sync with the real world. When the time comes to actually buy or sell, the buyers and sellers with a better read on the market will have an advantage.
What is my advice to buyers and sellers who want a competitive edge?
Combine the virtual world convenience of Zillow with the real world knowledge offered by a well-chosen Realtor.
Realtors work in the physical real estate world, not the digital real estate world. When I do a market analysis of a property, I do a careful, physical walkthrough and assessment of the property’s condition. I have personally seen the interior of most of the homes which are comparables so I can accurately compare the properties. I use my experience and the resources of the real estate community to create knowledge from the information I gather and the specific questions I ask. The final analysis is custom and unique to the property I’m analyzing, and not just a “hunch.” It takes hours of labor, years of experience, and analysis of the current market to know just what to focus on and how to interpret the information.
I take my job very seriously. I understand fully that the Seller is hiring me to get them the highest price and most favorable terms and to make sure they comply with disclosure requirements and local ordinances. The Seller trusts me with one of the most important investments they have. I give them my loyalty and all my skills to achieve their goals.
Realtors advocate for their clients. Do real estate sites really care if a buyer is successful in their house hunt or a seller gets the most money possible for their house? Of course not. They are selling advertising. Realtors however, do care, as it is both in their best interests and their clients’ to achieve their clients’ goals. Good Realtors are loyal, team players experienced in the art of making the deal so that everyone wins.
Realtors can maintain a pulse on the ever-changing dynamics of the marketplace. Algorithms cannot.
How to win at real estate?
Combine Internet information with the services of a Realtor. But don’t just “click” on a Realtor. Deliberately choose a Realtor. Use the same criteria as if you were choosing a dentist or a doctor. Choose a Realtor who cares about you and has the knowledge to best help you. Choose someone you can relate to, who is competent, works hard, is loyal and is looking out for your best interests. That person should be your team member. Together you will succeed. Real estate always has been and always will be a people business.
NOPA rents some of the highest in San Francsico | NOPA real estate trends
San Francisco’s median rent was a whopping $3,500 a month in the fourth quarter of 2014, according to leasing site LiveLovely.com, the highest in the nation. The median is up only $12 from the third quarter, but is $250 more than one year ago. Of course, this median is based on citywide rents for all apartment sizes and types in the city. When you break apartment rents down by neighborhood, that already high price can go soaring even higher.
http://blog.sfgate.com/ontheblock/2015/01/29/s-f-neighborhoods-with-the-highest-and-lowest-rents/
Pota Perimenis is committed to providing an accessible website. If you have difficulty accessing content, have difficulty viewing a file on the website, or notice any accessibility problems, please contact us at (415) 407-2595 to specify the nature of the accessibility issue and any assistive technology you use. We strive to provide the content you need in the format you require.